India Must Address Turkey’s Role as a State Sponsor of Terrorism

Michael Rubin, a Middle East expert, discusses Turkey’s sponsorship of terrorism and its implications for India. He emphasizes the need for India to adopt a more assertive diplomatic strategy, suggesting support for the Kurdish movement as a countermeasure. The evolving U.S. stance toward Turkey, particularly in Congress, also indicates a decline in Turkey’s influence due to its actions.

In a recent exclusive interview with IANS, Michael Rubin, a prominent Middle East expert, examined the intricacies of Turkey’s geopolitical dynamics, particularly its relationship with Pakistan and its sponsorship of Kashmiri terrorism. As a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, he draws upon his extensive field experience in several Middle Eastern nations, including Turkey.

Rubin discussed Abdullah Ocalan’s recent public statement urging the PKK to disarm, indicating that Ocalan has been isolated in prison for over two decades, limiting his capability to command the PKK. Despite being perceived as a founding figure, PKK’s leadership has diversified due to Ocalan’s absence, making it likely that they will resist disarming until ongoing hostilities cease.

Regarding Turkey’s alignment with Pakistan, Rubin stated that Turkey’s support for Islamist movements, including its involvement in Kashmir, poses increased concerns for India. He emphasized that the United States and its allies should rethink their strategies in response to Erdogan’s actions, suggesting that India may consider supporting the Kurdish movement as a diplomatic countermeasure.

Rubin criticized India’s historical diplomacy as overly passive and suggested a more aggressive approach in response to Turkey’s involvement in regional terrorism. He urged India to adapt its strategies in accordance with the threats it faces, particularly in light of Pakistan’s use of terrorism against it and Turkey’s backing.

The question of Western reactions to Turkey’s Islamist aspirations remains complex. While there seems to be bipartisan skepticism in Congress toward Turkey, uncertainty exists within U.S. foreign policy circles due to varying perceptions of Erdogan, especially during Trump’s administration. Rubin highlighted Congress’s diminishing regard for Turkey, with discussions surrounding designating Turkey as a state sponsor of terrorism gaining traction.

In conclusion, Michael Rubin’s insights shed light on the intricate ties between Turkey and Pakistan, particularly in relation to terrorism and regional security. He advocates for India’s strategic recalibration, suggesting increased support for the Kurdish cause as a potential counter to Turkey’s aggressive and ideologically driven foreign policy. Moreover, the changing dynamics in U.S.-Turkey relations indicate a growing skepticism that could affect Turkey’s role in international diplomacy. Ultimately, India must adopt a more assertive stance in addressing these geopolitical challenges.

Original Source: www.thehansindia.com