Former US Ambassador Advocates for US Withdrawal from Syria
Former US Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford recommends that the US withdraw its military forces from Syria, arguing this could stabilize the region and promote effective collaboration with the new Syrian government against ISIS. He highlights the challenges facing US forces and calls for easing sanctions to enhance stability and democratic development in Syria.
Former US Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford has presented a compelling argument in favor of the United States withdrawing its military forces from Syria, suggesting that such a move would be more beneficial for regional stability. In an article titled, “America Can Best Help Syria By Getting Out,” published in Foreign Affairs magazine, Ford posits that a partnership with the new transitional government in Damascus would enable the US to exit Syria on favorable terms.
Ford asserts that the US military presence is becoming increasingly precarious, as American forces lack a clear framework for their mission and face significant risks. Despite US backing of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in combating Daesh/ISIS, the terrorist organization continues to persist in the region. He recommends a shift in strategy as a means to enhance regional security and effectiveness against ISIS.
With the Assad regime’s decline, Ford encourages the US to engage with the newly established Syrian government in Damascus as a more capable ally in the fight against remnants of ISIS. Additionally, he emphasizes that the US should communicate effectively with the SDF regarding necessary compromises for future security arrangements in their controlled territories, which may include the eventual dissolution of the SDF.
Ford highlights the PKK/YPG, which operates under the aquiescent title of Syrian Democratic Forces, as a terrorist organization responsible for significant loss of life in its long-standing conflict with Türkiye. He advises that easing sanctions against Syria would be essential to help stabilize the nation and effectively combat ISIS.
Ford further argues that fostering public activism, enhanced legal frameworks, and protection of freedoms are essential for Syria’s progression toward a genuine democracy. He acknowledges that while the path ahead is fraught with complexity, the resolution ultimately rests in the hands of the Syrian people. Yet, he firmly believes that “it should not require an American hand on the wheel—or American boots on the ground.”
Bashar Assad, Syria’s leader for nearly 25 years, recently fled to Russia on December 8, marking the end of an era for the Baath Party. Subsequently, on January 29, a new transitional president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, was appointed, signaling a significant shift that includes the dissolution of the old regime’s armed factions, security agencies, and constitutional framework.
In conclusion, Robert Ford’s insights reflect a significant shift in America’s approach to Syria, advocating for military withdrawal and emphasizing collaboration with the new government in combating terrorism and fostering stability. By easing sanctions and encouraging democratic principles, Ford believes the US can play a supportive role in Syria’s transformative efforts without direct military involvement. This perspective invites further consideration of the impact and viability of US foreign policy in the region going forward.
Original Source: www.aa.com.tr
