Trump Allies Claim “Mossad Agents” and “Warmongers” Disrupting Iran Talks
Former Trump allies express concerns that “Mossad agents” and “warmongers” aim to derail U.S.-Iran negotiations. Tucker Carlson and Clayton Morris criticize the Pentagon’s pro-Israel stance while highlighting the ideological split within Trump’s administration. As public opinion shifts against Israel, Trump balances foreign policy, attempting to refrain from new Middle East conflicts during talks with Iran.
In a surprising twist of rhetoric, some of former President Donald Trump’s supporters are claiming that “Mossad agents” and “warmongers” are attempting to sabotage the ongoing talks between the United States and Iran. Notably, these statements stem not from foreign adversaries, but from advocates within Trump’s circle, reflecting a stark shift in the political landscape concerning U.S.-Iran relations.
Last week, Tucker Carlson, a prominent conservative media figure, hosted a discussion featuring Dan Caldwell, a recently removed Department of Defense official. Caldwell was criticized for allegedly leaking classified information concerning Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s communication methods. Carlson suggested that Caldwell’s ousting was politically motivated, alleging it stemmed from his divergence from mainstream military perspectives.
Carlson’s assertions reveal a bigger narrative being shaped by blanket claims of insider disloyalty towards what they describe as “warmongers” in Washington. He remarked on Caldwell, saying, “You did make maybe one career mistake by giving on-the-record interviews describing your foreign policy views…that are out of the mainstream among warmongers in Washington,” implying that this led to his portrayal as a traitor.
On Sunday, former Fox News anchor Clayton Morris shared similar sentiments, pointing a finger at pro-Israel factions supposedly working to undermine Trump’s Pentagon team. He claimed on his show, Redacted, that “former Israeli Mossad agents are working overtime” to discredit Hegseth. However, Morris did not provide specific names for these alleged agents.
The Trump administration appears to be experiencing a noteworthy ideological divide. On one hand, traditional Republicans like Secretary of State Marco Rubio advocate for more hawkish stances, while on the other, isolationists such as chief of staff Susie Wiles align more closely with the “America First” objectives. This divergence signals a critical moment in the Republican Party’s approach to foreign policy.
The recent firings at the Pentagon, including that of Caldwell, seem to have energized the faction aligned with Trump’s isolationist stance. Their criticism of pro-Israel advocates and implied former Mossad agents reflects a marked shift from the party’s historically interventionist views surrounding the Middle East.
Fielding increasing scrutiny are Trump supporters targeting Merav Ceren, nominated head of Iran and Israel policy at the National Security Council. Critics suggest that Ceren’s background in Israel’s Ministry of Defence disqualifies her, with Morris claiming, “Neo-con Mike Waltz has now hired basically a dual citizen and former IDF official to work under him.”
Amid this internal strife, public sentiment towards Israel is reportedly shifting. A Pew Poll released in April indicates that 53 percent of Americans now harbor unfavorable opinions about Israel, a jump from 42 percent the previous year. This trend is particularly striking among younger Republicans, many of whom engage with platforms like Morris’s Redacted and Carlson’s shows.
Trump’s own foreign policy approach faces pushback from various fronts. His envoy for the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, suggested an initial openness to allowing Iran to maintain low-level uranium enrichment before a shift back to a more hardline stance under pro-Israel pressure. Similarly, Rubio indicated the possibility of the U.S. re-engaging in negotiations, contingent on Iran halting enrichment activities.
As U.S. and Iranian negotiators met in Oman for discussions, Trump asserted confidence in the negotiations stating, “Talks are going very well”. He added, “We’ll have something without having to start dropping bombs all over the place,” which reflects his delicate balancing act on foreign policy.
It is clear it is still a complicated narrative unfolding as many factions within the Republican Party fight for direction amid a shifting geopolitical landscape.
In conclusion, a noteworthy ideological rift is developing within Trump’s support base regarding the U.S. approach to Iran, with accusations flying towards pro-Israel voices and claims about foreign interference. With public opinion shifting against Israel and Trump’s foreign policy facing inherent contradictions, the outcome of negotiations with Iran will be pivotal. This situation illustrates the evolving dynamics within both the Republican Party and U.S.-Iran relations, as negotiations continue amid complex internal and external pressures.
Original Source: www.middleeasteye.net
