The Irony of Due Process: Duterte’s Arrest Amidst His Drug War Victims’ Grief
This article examines the disparity in due process experienced by Rodrigo Duterte compared to the victims of his drug war. It recounts specific cases, particularly that of Constantino De Juan, and highlights the emotional turmoil of affected families. The text underscores the continued influence of Duterte, despite his arrest for human rights violations, and reflects on the implications for justice in the Philippines.
The article discusses the disparity between the due process experienced by former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte and the victims of his drug war. It highlights the tragic case of Constantino De Juan, a victim of police violence, and the lasting impact of Duterte’s policies on families. Human rights groups estimate that Duterte’s drug war may have resulted in up to 30,000 fatalities, whereas official figures cite over 6,000.
Duterte explicitly encouraged violence against suspected drug users, framing the killings as justice rather than murder. His statements about drug users portrayed them as dangerous individuals deserving of such fates. On March 16, news broke of Duterte’s arrest, prompting mixed feelings among families of his victims, including gratitude for the arrest but sorrow for the loss of their loved ones who never received justice.
The article recounts various personal accounts from family members who are simultaneously filled with joy at Duterte’s arrest and grief for their lost relatives. Many shared the painful memories of how their loved ones were taken from them. Victims like Juan’s widow, Lourdes, expressed happiness for the arrest but lamented that justice had not been served for her husband and others, whose lives were brutally cut short.
Duterte’s arrest has led to protests, showcasing a divide in public opinion. Supporters still hold him in high regard, illustrating his continued influence despite the international scrutiny regarding his human rights abuses. As families like Juan’s continue to endure their grief and seek recognition for their loved ones, they reflect on the broader implications of a regime that devalued human life.
Ultimately, the text serves as a poignant reminder of the complexity of justice, the impact of Duterte’s presidency on countless families, and the hope that accountability can prevail in such a wake of violence. Their stories reveal the cultural and personal scars of a drug war that redefined justice under Duterte’s rule.
In summary, this article powerfully highlights the paradox of due process as experienced by former President Duterte versus the victims of his drug war. It illustrates the personal grief of families, notably emphasizing the impact on children who have lost their parents. As the dialogue surrounding accountability continues, it is imperative that the stories of those affected by the violence are acknowledged and remembered, serving as a sobering reminder of the tragic consequences of Duterte’s policies.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
